Lead journey: form to CRM
Website form, enrichment, CRM entry, notification to the sales inbox: the classic among zaps. We rebuild the journey in n8n and add error handling so that no lead is quietly lost anymore.
Impact No lead loss on API errorsAs a GDPR-clean alternative to Zapier and Make, we rely on n8n, self-hosted in Germany on request, or on Power Automate within the Microsoft stack. Zapier and Make are good entry-level tools, but at some point requirements grow beyond them. We assess honestly whether a switch is worth it and migrate your zaps and scenarios transparently at a fixed price.
Zapier and Make made it easy for you to get started with automation, and that was a good decision. But many companies notice after one or two years: the bill grows faster than the benefit.
Typical zaps and scenarios that we rebuild, clean up and move into test operation. In the process, the new version usually ends up leaner than the original.
Website form, enrichment, CRM entry, notification to the sales inbox: the classic among zaps. We rebuild the journey in n8n and add error handling so that no lead is quietly lost anymore.
Impact No lead loss on API errorsPull incoming invoices from the inbox, extract the data, and file them in the right folder and in the accounting software. Runs in n8n on your server, so sensitive receipt data never leaves the EU.
Savings 2–4 h per weekShop order to inventory management, shipping label and customer email: at high order volumes every task on Zapier or Make gets expensive. Self-hosted, the thousandth run costs the same as the first, namely nothing extra.
Impact Fixed costs instead of volume tariffAutomatically distribute daily revenue, open tickets or stock levels to Teams, Slack or by email. When Microsoft 365 is already in place, we often build such journeys directly in Power Automate, without an additional subscription.
Savings 1–2 h per weekTen individual zaps with filters and helper tables often become a single, transparent workflow with branches in n8n. During the migration we clean up rather than copying legacy clutter one to one.
Impact One workflow instead of ten zapsThere is no single right answer. For most SMEs the best alternative is either n8n, self-hosted in Germany, or Power Automate within the Microsoft stack. We recommend the target system based on your systems, your volume and your data protection requirements, not on our own preference.
Self-hostedOpen-source automation, hosted in Germany or directly on your premises. No cost per run, full control over data and logic, and even complex branches and custom processing steps can be mapped cleanly.
Microsoft 365If your processes already run in Outlook, Teams and SharePoint, Power Automate is often the shorter path. The license is often already included in the existing M365 package, one less tool in the subscription stack.
Sometimes the inventory shows: the real problem is not the tool but the process behind it. Then it pays off to look at automation as a whole before migrating.
From the inventory to switching off the old account in four steps. At a fixed price that you know before we start.
We go through all zaps and scenarios with you: what is running, what is dead, what should be merged. The result is a list with a clear recommendation per workflow.
We rebuild the workflows in n8n or Power Automate, add error handling and logging, and document every step transparently.
Old and new run side by side, and we compare the results on real cases. We only switch off once the new journey demonstrably runs cleanly.
We switch over, cancel the old tariffs together with you, and hand over documentation and access. Your team can then adjust the workflows themselves.
If you do not have any existing zaps yet but want to automate for the first time, you do not need a migration. Then we start directly in the right tool, without the detour via a subscription model.
In the free initial analysis we look at your zaps and scenarios together: 60 minutes, no obligation. Afterwards you know whether a switch pays off or whether you are better off staying where you are.
Zapier can generally be used in a GDPR-compliant way with a data processing agreement and standard contractual clauses, but the data runs through the servers of a US provider. For customer data, applications or health data, many data protection officers view this critically. A self-hosted alternative such as n8n in Germany removes this discussion entirely, because the data never leaves your infrastructure.
A typical migration with 10 to 30 Zaps takes us around 30 days including parallel operation. The inventory takes one to two days, the rebuild one to two weeks depending on complexity, after which old and new run side by side for two to four weeks. Individual simple Zaps can also be migrated within a few days.
If you run a few simple workflows with low volume and no sensitive data, a switch is usually not economical. Zapier and Make are good tools for this use case, and a migration costs time and money that wouldn't pay off. That is exactly what we assess in the initial analysis, and we will tell you so honestly.
With self-hosted n8n, you don't pay a fee per execution, only the server, usually a low double-digit amount per month depending on size, plus occasional maintenance. On top of that comes the one-time migration, which we offer at a fixed price. We calculate specifically in the initial analysis from what task volume this pays off.
When your company already works with Microsoft 365 and the workflows mainly connect Outlook, Teams, SharePoint or Excel. Then the license is often already available, login runs through your existing Microsoft accounts, and IT doesn't need to operate an additional system. For workflows spanning many non-Microsoft systems, n8n is usually the more flexible choice.